This paper is concerned with corporate responses to grievances held by local communities in resource extractive settings. Across the pathologies, the common denominator is the corporate propensity to avoid recognising the legitimacy of a local grievance and the source of its cause. In practice, however, it is fiction, illegibility and invisibility that dominate. These managerial systems, or operational-level grievance mechanisms, map the procedural contours of how a local grievance would travel once it is made visible to the company. Our contention is that the grievance landscape is far more critical to understanding environmental, human rights, and mining interactions than the managerial systems that companies construct to signal compliance with voluntary international norms. The arguments draw on classic and contemporary literature on “grievance”, “right” and “entitlement”, and the authors’ own sustained engagement with global mining companies and local communities. This paper focuses on the complex operational and organisational settings in which grievances arise and the industrial pathologies that form around resource development projects. Grievance landscapes form in rapidly industrialising contexts where social and environmental impacts are inevitable.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |